Counter-Terrorism and Sentencing Bill completes passage through Parliament

There is no description available for this image (ID: 119339)

The Counter-Terrorism and Sentencing Bill returned to the Lords for consideration of Commons amendments in ‘ping pong’ on Thursday 25 March.

Catch up on Parliament TV
Read the Lords Hansard transcript
Bills and legislation: Counter-Terrorism and Sentencing Bill
Explore the Lords Library briefing
What is consideration of Commons amendments/ping pong?

Members discussed time limits on Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures (TPIMs) notices and agreed a compromise with the House of Commons to limit their length to five years. This followed calls by members of the Lords to introduce a limit on the notices at an earlier stage.

Members also discussed the progress of the bill through the House at its conclusion of Lords stages.

Following both Houses agreement on the text of the bill, it received Royal Assent and became an Act of Parliament (law).

Third reading: Thursday 11 March

No changes to the wording of the bill were suggested ahead of third reading.

Members discussed the progress of the bill through the House at its conclusion of Lords stages.

Following completion of third reading, the bill passed to the Commons for consideration of Lords amendments.

Report stage: Wednesday 3 March

Members discussed a range of topics including, including prison capacities and requirements for independent reviews on radicalisation, and asked the government to think again on time limits for Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures (TPIMs) notices.

There were four divisions (votes) on proposed amendments (changes) to the bill.

Trial of the issue

The first vote was on amendment 1, which requires that a trial of the issue be used to determine whether there is a terrorist connection in relation to an aggravated offence.

Members voted 126 in favour and 281 against, so the change was not made.

TPIM notices

The second vote was on amendment 16, which imposes a four-year limit on Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures (TPIM) notices.

Members voted 316 in favour and 267 against, so the change was made.

Residence measures

The third vote was on amendment 18, which removes a clause from the bill regarding TPIM residence measures.

Members voted 103 in favour and 300 against, so the change was not made.

Polygraph measures

The final vote was on amendment 21, which removes a clause from the bill regarding the TPIM polygraph measures.

Members voted 106 in favour and 292 against, so the change was not made.

Committee stage day two: Tuesday 9 February

Members discussed a range of topics, including radicalisation in prisons, polygraph testing on terrorist offenders and the Act's impact on the National Probation Service.

Committee stage day one: Tuesday 26 January

Members discussed a range of topics, including rehabilitation and de-radicalisation programmes, release of prisoners serving a serious terrorism sentence and polygraph testing.

Second reading: Monday 21 September

The purpose of the bill is to ensure that serious and dangerous terrorist offenders spend longer in custody, reflecting the seriousness of the offences they have committed.

Catch up on Parliament TV 
Read the transcript in Lords Hansard
Bills and legislation: Counter-Terrorism and Sentencing Bill
What is second reading?

Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative), government spokesperson, opened the debate.

Members discussed its key areas including the sentencing of terrorist offenders, removal or restriction of early release for terrorist prisoners, terrorism prevention and investigation measures (TPIMs) and the Prevent strategy.

Speakers included a former deputy assistant commissioner in the Metropolitan Police and a former independent reviewer of terrorism legislation.

Lord Vaizey of Didcot (Conservative) and the Bishop of Manchester made their maiden speeches.

Home Office Minister Baroness Williams of Trafford (Conservative), responded on behalf of the government.