Extant arms exports exceed £5 billion

• Report: Scrutiny of Arms Exports 2015
• Report: Scrutiny of Arms Exports 2015 (PDF 1,009 KB)
• Report: Scrutiny of Arms Exports 2015 Vol II (PDF 5 MB)
• Report: Scrutiny of Arms Exports 2015 Vol III (PDF 3 MB)
• Inquiry: Scrutiny of Arms Exports 2015
• Committees on Arms Export Controls

Chairman writes to Foreign Secretary on arms exports to Russia

The 2015 Report of the Committees on Arms Export Controls (CAEC) once again scrutinizes the Government’s arms exports and arms control policies and practices in unprecedented depth and detail.

The Committees’ scrutiny encompasses the Government’s quarterly information on arms export licences, arms export control legislation and procedures, organisational and operational issues, Arms Export Agreements, Arms Control Agreements, arms export control policies, and arms exports to Countries of concern.

New areas of scrutiny for the Committees

In this Report the Committees have continued their scrutiny of all the policy areas covered in their 2014 Report, but in addition have extended their scrutiny for the first time to the Export Control Organisation’s computer system (SPIRE) and its website, to Russia and the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, to the consequences of the Government’s policy of encouraging arms exporters to transfer from Standard Individual Export Licences to Open Individual Export Licences, and to the use of chlorine chemical weapons in Syria. In addition the Committees have added Hong Kong and Qatar to their own list of Countries and Territories of arms export concern over and above the Countries of Human Rights concern listed by the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.  

Scrutiny of FCO's Countries of Human Rights concern

Once again the Committees’ Report details for each of the FCO’s 28 named Countries of Human Rights concern the number of extant strategic export licences for each country, their value (where provided by the Government) and the nature of the strategic exports that have been approved. The table in the Report summarising this information is as follows:

N.B. The monetary values shown are for SIELs only as the Government does not supply the value of OIEL licences.

Details of the extant strategic exports to each of the countries in the above table are at Annex 9 of Volume II to this Report.

Additional Countries of Concern to the Committees

The Committees have provided the equivalent information for 5 Additional Countries of concern to the Committees. Four of these countries — Bahrain, Egypt, Tunisia and Ukraine — are countries where there are grounds for Human Rights concerns, but are not currently within the FCO’s designated 28 Countries of Human Rights concern. The remaining country — Argentina — is a country of arms export concern by virtue of its policy towards the Falkland Islands. The table in the Report that summaries the information for the additional 5 Countries of concern is as follows:

N.B. The monetary values shown are for SIELs only as the Government does not supply the value of OIEL licences.

Details of the extant strategic exports to each of the countries in the above Table are at Annex 9 of Volume II to this Report.

Quote from the Chairman, Sir John Stanley

MH17

"Following the destruction of Malaysian airliner MH17 and all on board, I sent a further letter yesterday to the Foreign Secretary on UK arms exports to Russia which the Committees have been scrutinising in detail.

Arms export policy

The most significant change in the Government’s policy on arms exports since the Committees’ 2013 Report is the dropping of the wording in the previous October 2000 Consolidated Criteria that: "An export licence will not be issued if the arguments for doing so are outweighed … by concern that the goods might be used for internal repression" when the Business Secretary announced the present Government’s revised Consolidated Criteria on 25 March 2014. This wording was dropped notwithstanding the fact that the then Foreign Secretary had unequivocally confirmed that this remained the Government’s policy in his Oral Evidence to the Committees on 7 February 2012. The Committees have unanimously recommended that this policy wording, which represents an important safeguard against UK arms exports being used for internal repression, be reinstated.

Dual-use chemicals to Syria

The Committees have been unable to make a complete Report to the House of Commons of its detailed scrutiny of Government policy since 2004 on the export to Syria of dual-use chemicals that could be used in the manufacture of chemical weapons because the Government refused to disclose to the Committees the names of the companies to whom export licences were granted unless the Committees undertook to take evidence from the companies in private, but not in public. Having carried out their detailed scrutiny, and having taken evidence from 2 of the 3 companies concerned in private, the Committees have concluded that the decision of the previous Government to give 5 export licence approvals for a dual-use chemical to Syria between July 2004 and May 2010 "was highly questionable" and that the decision of the present Government to give 2 export licence approvals for dual-use  chemicals to Syria in January 2012 after the civil war had started in Syria in 2011 "was irresponsible."

Priority markets for arms exports

The Committees welcomed the decision of the Business Secretary to provide the Committees with the Government’s explanation – country-by-country – as to why each country included in the Government’s Priority Markets List for UK arms exports for 2014/15 is included in the List. This explanation is reproduced in full in Volume II evidence on page Ev 60.

Recommendation that the Government is more cautious in approving arms export licences

The Committees have repeated their previous Recommendation – not accepted by the Government so far – that the Government should apply significantly more cautious judgements when considering export licence applications for goods to authoritarian regimes which might be used for internal repression."

Format of the Report

The Committees’ Report and evidence is in three volumes. Volume I is the Report and is available in print from the TSO and on the Committee website. Volumes II and III are Evidence and are also available on the Committee website .

Further information

• About Parliament: Select Committees
• Visiting Parliament: Watch Committees